How to Evolve Irrational Preferences

نویسنده

  • Peter Danielson
چکیده

Cooperation in a single play prisoner’s dilemma is irrational. We consider a simple model where this irrational behavior will evolve, via the evolution of cooperative preferences. These players cooperate rationally, given their preferences and common knowledge, but their preferences distort – fail to track their interests in – their situation. Generalizing, we show that distortions are predictable; our evolved agents’ preferences will track all but two problematic situations, and here they will take on cooperative distortions. These models introduce the concepts and tools of evolutionary game theory – reproductive fitness values, replicator dynamics and the genetic algorithm – to address the question: when should we expect agents to be rational and when should we expect them to be something else.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Persuasion, Slack, and Traps: How Can Economists Change the World?

Contrary to my critics, voter irrationality does not imply that economists cannot mitigate political failure. With rational voters, reform-minded economists have few viable tactics; with irrational voters reformers have more options. Rational voters can be swayed only by facts and logic; irrational voters could respond to better rhetoric. Rational voters strategically punish those who ignore th...

متن کامل

Comparative of irrational beliefs and diseases anxiety disorders in women with systemic lupus erythematous and healthy women

The aim of this study was to compare irrational beliefs and anxiety disorder (self-morbidity) in women with and without systemic lupus erythematosus. This was a descriptive causal-comparative study. The statistical population of the study included all female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Kermanshah in 2018. By random sampling method, 50 women with lupus and 50 non-lupus were sel...

متن کامل

Subjective Hazard Rates Rationalize "Irrational" Temporal Preferences

Delay discounting refers to decision makers’ tendency to treat immediately consumable goods as more valuable than those only available after some delay. Previous work has focused on a seemingly irrational feature of these preferences: the systematic tendency to exhibit more patience when consequences are far in the future but less patience about those same, identical rewards as time passes. One...

متن کامل

Genetic Variation and Covariation in Male Attractiveness and Female Mating Preferences in Drosophila melanogaster

How mating preferences evolve remains one of the major unsolved mysteries in evolutionary biology. One major impediment to the study of ornament-preference coevolution is that many aspects of the theoretical literature remain loosely connected to empirical data. Theoretical models typically streamline mating preferences by describing preference functions with a single parameter, a modeling conv...

متن کامل

Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.

Sexual selection is a potent evolutionary force. However, very few models have considered the evolution of female preferences for traits expressed in both sexes. Here we explore how female preferences coevolve with sexually antagonistic traits, which involve alleles that are beneficial to one sex but harmful to the other. We show that with a sexually antagonistic trait on the X chromosome (male...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997